Skip to main content

Dixon's Independent Voice

Dixon Sewer Referenda Headed for November Ballot

05/18/2014 05:05PM, Published by Dave Scholl, Categories: Business, City+School, Viewpoints, Local Life, News



Dixon Sewer Referenda Headed for November Ballot

Over 1,600 Signatures Gathered. Over 1,300 Likely Valid

The two referenda on the Dixon Sewer controversy have succeeded in gathering more than the required number of valid signatures of registered Dixon voters, according to a preliminary review by the petitioners - the Dixon Chapter of the Solano County Taxpayers Association (DC-SCTA).

The group has filed petitions with over 1,600 for each of the two referenda. They verified that over 1,250 were verified on each referenda as being registered. The group compared the signatures with a list from the Solano County Registrar of Voters.

Only 915 valid signatures were required. The final total will be about 45% higher than the requirement.

The two City Council resolutions being challenged - Resolution 14-061 and 062 - will be suspended until subject to a vote of the people in November.

Resolution 061 doubled the sewer rates - those rates now cannot be imposed pending that vote.

Resolution 062 authorized the City to agree to loans of $30 million from the State Water Board’s Revolving Fund. That resolution is also now suspended, leaving the City without authorization to commit to the loans.

The signed petitions will be submitted to the City Clerk tomorrow - Monday, May 19 - and then forwarded to the Solano County Registrar of Voters.

The Registrar’s staff will perform a random verification check - a portion of the signatures will be checked. The percentage results of that process will then be applied to the total number collected - and assume the rest of the signatures will have the same percentage valid.

If that statistic shows the total will likely exceed the minimum by at least 10 percent, the Registrar will declare the petitions as qualified for the ballot. If the projected valid signatures are less than 10% above the minimum, a full check of all signatures will be done.

Besides filing the petitions, the DC-SCTA informed the State Revolving Fund and the Water Quality Board staff about the current status.

DC-SCTA President Drew Graska wrote in a letter to those state officials:

“The amount of signatures turned in were far in excess of the ten percent (10%) of all registered voters in Dixon as required by Elections Code and our group has verified over 1200 signatures as being valid. …

“As we have already identified two projects already in operation elsewhere in the United States which far surpass the benefits of activated sludge and which address a primary constituent of concern, Boron, we feel it makes economic sense to proceed with a less than $1 million solution than this $28.5 million ‘accepted technology’ solution. As the remaining amount of the $33 million total is for headworks and infrastructure improvements, for which the current rate payers have already paid with increased rates for the last five years when it was only to last three, we will not support even a loan for a lesser amount to address new development’s obligations.

“Court action on the basis of health and safety requirements, while a loser for the city and any one else who would bring those charges against us, would be welcomed as a method to “clear the air” exactly how the State Water Quality Control Board ignores the taxpayer, makes back room deals with city staff and their consultants, and ignores advances in treatment options.”

The “In-Pipe” company has already met with Dixon city officials, and will be making a public presentation in the near future.

Further investigations by the DC-SCTA have found additional new technology that will remove heavy metals and other materials at a fraction of the cost to build and operate as that proposed by city staff and consultants.

The IV website and newspaper will update the situation as it develops.



sewer referendum referenda city


You might also like

Thumb_2226-front-page---crowd-at-council

Sewer Rate Hike Protest Fills Council Chambers

The Dixon City Council chamber was packed almost to capacity this past Tuesday, as about 90 Dixon residents attended to protest the recent doubling of Sewer Fees and the council’s refusal to allow the issue to go on the ballot in the November General Election. The protest rally caught members of the council by surprise, as Mayor Batchelor and Council members Steve Bird and Jerry Casteñon snuck by the crowd and into the chambers - where the doors were closed until shortly before the meeting was to begin. Vice-Mayor Thom Bogue, however, joined the crowd and encouraged their participation. The rally continued to grow in size both outside the chambers, and once inside. An obviously nervous mayor Batchelor - whose voice was quivering and body language should discomfort and annoyance - announced at the beginning of the Public Comments of Items Not on the Agenda, that speakers would be limited to a maximum of five minutes.
Thumb_council-rogues-gallery

Mayor & Council Thumb Noses at Voters

Once again at the City Council meeting Tuesday, June 10, the people showed emphatically their opposition to the doubling of sewer rates and commitment to borrow $30 million
Thumb_2214-in-pipe-sewer-plant

Proven Microbiological System Could Solve Dixon Sewer Issue & Save Millions

City Staff Hide Option from Council Since 2010 Proven Microbiological System Could Solve Dixon Sewer Issue & Save Millions. "Green" Tech Firm Interest in Dixon as Demonstration Project A proven advanced waste water treatment technique using microbiology could resolve Dixon’s sewer issues within months, and at a cost of less than one-dollar per month per hook-up. That is in contrast to a $30 million “activated sludge” project that can’t be on line until late 2015, and will double sewer fees to every Dixon home. In fact, the advanced system could have been in operation over three years ago if local officials hadn’t ignored the information and hid it from the City Council when it was first provided to the staff in 2010

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events for this date. You can always add an event.

It looks like we don't have any events right now. You can always add an event.


Image title
Image title
Lambtown Lambtown Festival
Image title